Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Switch to use registerFileSystemsOnce for SerializablePipelineOptions constructor #34028

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Abacn
Copy link
Contributor

@Abacn Abacn commented Feb 19, 2025

partly mitigate #18430 ; fix #33965

Please add a meaningful description for your change here


Thank you for your contribution! Follow this checklist to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily:

  • Mention the appropriate issue in your description (for example: addresses #123), if applicable. This will automatically add a link to the pull request in the issue. If you would like the issue to automatically close on merging the pull request, comment fixes #<ISSUE NUMBER> instead.
  • Update CHANGES.md with noteworthy changes.
  • If this contribution is large, please file an Apache Individual Contributor License Agreement.

See the Contributor Guide for more tips on how to make review process smoother.

To check the build health, please visit https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/.test-infra/BUILD_STATUS.md

GitHub Actions Tests Status (on master branch)

Build python source distribution and wheels
Python tests
Java tests
Go tests

See CI.md for more information about GitHub Actions CI or the workflows README to see a list of phrases to trigger workflows.

Copy link
Contributor

Checks are failing. Will not request review until checks are succeeding. If you'd like to override that behavior, comment assign set of reviewers

@Abacn
Copy link
Contributor Author

Abacn commented Feb 19, 2025

testStreamsStartCorrectly (org.apache.beam.runners.dataflow.worker.streaming.harness.FanOutStreamingEngineWorkerHarnessTest) failed

not related to the change

@Abacn
Copy link
Contributor Author

Abacn commented Feb 19, 2025

assign set of reviewers

Copy link
Contributor

Assigning reviewers. If you would like to opt out of this review, comment assign to next reviewer:

R: @robertwb added as fallback since no labels match configuration

Available commands:

  • stop reviewer notifications - opt out of the automated review tooling
  • remind me after tests pass - tag the comment author after tests pass
  • waiting on author - shift the attention set back to the author (any comment or push by the author will return the attention set to the reviewers)

The PR bot will only process comments in the main thread (not review comments).

Copy link
Contributor

Reminder, please take a look at this pr: @robertwb

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 3, 2025

Assigning new set of reviewers because Pr has gone too long without review. If you would like to opt out of this review, comment assign to next reviewer:

R: @robertwb added as fallback since no labels match configuration

Available commands:

  • stop reviewer notifications - opt out of the automated review tooling
  • remind me after tests pass - tag the comment author after tests pass
  • waiting on author - shift the attention set back to the author (any comment or push by the author will return the attention set to the reviewers)

@@ -59,7 +59,6 @@ public PipelineOptions get() {
private void readObject(ObjectInputStream is) throws IOException, ClassNotFoundException {
is.defaultReadObject();
this.options = deserializeFromJson(serializedPipelineOptions);
// TODO https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/18430: remove this call.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why is this no longer relevant? This still seems dicy (unconditionally overwriting the options as a side effect of deserialization).

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Restored TODO statement here for now

@Abacn Abacn changed the title Switch to use registerFileSystemsOnce for SerializablePipelineOptions Switch to use registerFileSystemsOnce for SerializablePipelineOptions constructor Mar 10, 2025
@derrickaw
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @Abacn - friendly reminder to fix failures. Thanks!

Copy link
Contributor

Reminder, please take a look at this pr: @robertwb

Copy link
Contributor

Assigning new set of reviewers because Pr has gone too long without review. If you would like to opt out of this review, comment assign to next reviewer:

R: @robertwb added as fallback since no labels match configuration

Available commands:

  • stop reviewer notifications - opt out of the automated review tooling
  • remind me after tests pass - tag the comment author after tests pass
  • waiting on author - shift the attention set back to the author (any comment or push by the author will return the attention set to the reviewers)

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 4, 2025

Reminder, please take a look at this pr: @robertwb

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug]: Race condition in FileSystems initialisation
3 participants